From Florida 2000 to Ohio 2004: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
by Jude Julien
The controversy surrounding the Presidential Election of 2000 lingered in the hearts of many Americans. We all know that America is far from perfect; however, Americans have a great deal of pride in the electoral system because it gives them an opportunity to participate in the government. After all, voting is the foundation of our democratic nation. The 2000 election revealed that our voting process is far from perfect. In Florida, there were countless allegations of irregularities and illegal tactics used at the polls that may have cost Al Gore the presidency. Incidents such as the infamous butterfly and caterpillar ballots may have changed the outcome. Even more alarming was the allegation of violations of the Voting Rights Act. A number of registered African-American voters reported that they were denied their right to vote. For instance, many African-American voters were turned away from the polls because they did not have appropriate identification, yet white voters who lacked identification were accommodated. Given the fact that Bush won Florida by a slim margin of approximately 500 votes, some political analysts believe that these and other factors could have made a difference in the outcome.
In the aftermath of the 2000 presidential elections, many believed that appropriate steps would be taken to ensure the legitimacy of this basic democratic process. Although some reforms were instituted, they weren

t sufficient. Reports of major voter anomalies have surfaced again, this time in Ohio. Congressman John Conyers, Jr. (D-Ohio) has requested an investigation into irregularities in the Ohio presidential election. These irregularities include the following:
- Due to the misallocation of machines, some inner city voters had to wait ten hours to vote while their suburban counterparts had no wait.
- A voter
s registration was thrown out because it did not meet the paper weight requirements of the Secretary of State,
Ken Blackwell.
These are just a few accounts of the unjust practices that transpired during the Ohio presidential election. Conyers believes that these irregularities created voter disenfranchisement and warrant a widespread investigation by Congress. He also suggests that the electors from the State of Ohio be challenged. Finally, Conyers recommends that election reforms be enacted immediately to restore the public

s faith in our democratic process.
It is quite peculiar that these incidents have received no press coverage. Prominent Democrats such as John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have made little to no of the reports of voter disenfranchisement in Ohio or the actions taken by Conyers. Conyers received support from fellow Representatives Stephanie Jones Tubs, Ted Strickland and Maxine Walters. Senator Barbara Boxer was the only Senator courageous enough to allow the issue to be raised for debate on the senate floor.
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of American Politics, is represented by those that spoke out against injustice, those that sat silent and those that conspired against a people. Perhaps Kerry felt it was better to save face and be a good loser rather than blame his loss on voting misconduct in light of the 2000 election fiasco/controversy. I sincerely hope this is not the case. Congressman Conyers and others have uncovered a serious problem in our society that should be investigated. The United States has recently been involved in establishing democracies in other countries. It seems as though our leaders should invest more time addressing the problems of democracy at home.